Best Trading Journals for Hyperliquid Traders (2026)
How this list was ranked
Each entry was evaluated on five criteria: native Hyperliquid integration, execution capability, position sizing, fee modeling accuracy, and total cost of ownership for an active perp trader. PerpLog leads for Hyperliquid-specific use because it owns all five categories at once; the legacy journals lead for their respective niches. The ranking is honest about who PerpLog is and isn't for — if you don't trade Hyperliquid, three of these alternatives fit you better.
Comparison table
| Journal | Hyperliquid | Execution | Auto-journal | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PerpLog | Native | Yes | Yes | 0.01% per executed trade · all features included |
| Tradervue | CSV only | No | No | Free tier · Silver $29/mo · Gold $49/mo · Diamond $79/mo |
| Edgewonk | CSV only | No | No | One-time license $169/year |
| TradeZella | CSV only | No | No | Basic $29/mo · Premium $39/mo · Elite $49/mo |
| Tradelytics | CSV only | No | No | Free tier · Pro $25/mo |
1. PerpLog
Best for: Hyperliquid traders who want sizing + execution + journaling in one tool
A trading journal and execution platform built specifically for Hyperliquid perpetual futures traders. Trades execute through the platform and auto-journal with full P&L, fees, duration, and tags.
Pros
- Auto-journals every trade executed through the platform — no CSV import, no manual entry
- Position sizer with real Hyperliquid fee modeling (maker/taker tier + HYPE staking discount + entry/exit)
- Adaptive Sizing engine: quarter-Kelly with Bayesian shrinkage on segmented stats
- Bracket orders (Entry + SL + TP) and Pyramid Entries with enforced SL floor
- Server-side trailing stops that run 24/7 even when the browser is closed
- Mirror Discount: same percentage off as your HYPE staking tier
Cons
- Hyperliquid only — no support for centralized exchanges or other DEXs (yet)
- Newer product (2024-2026) — fewer historical case studies than legacy journals
When PerpLog wins
You trade Hyperliquid perps, want one tool for sizing/execution/journaling, and value adaptive risk over manual analytics.
2. Tradervue
Best for: Multi-asset traders (stocks/options/futures) with broker imports already in place
The legacy gold standard for stocks, options, and futures journaling. Deep broker integrations and a decade-plus of refinement on review workflows, tags, and reporting.
Pros
- Imports from 100+ brokers; mature CSV pipelines for almost any source
- Powerful tagging, mistakes, and review workflows refined over many years
- Strong reporting and risk metrics (MAE/MFE, expectancy by tag)
Cons
- No Hyperliquid integration; manual CSV import for DEX trades
- No execution capability — journal-only
- Subscription pricing scales quickly for serious volume
When Tradervue wins
You trade stocks/options on a broker Tradervue already integrates with and want the most battle-tested journaling workflow.
Visit: www.tradervue.com
3. Edgewonk
Best for: Forex/CFD traders who want deep customization and psychological metrics
A versatile multi-asset journal with strong analytics for forex and CFDs. Manual journaling with deep customizability and useful psychology tracking.
Pros
- Strong forex/CFD support with custom asset classes
- Trade simulator and "Monte Carlo" projections built in
- Detailed psychology metrics (Tilt-meter, mistakes, custom flags)
Cons
- No Hyperliquid integration — heavy manual entry for crypto perps
- Yearly license rather than per-trade pricing
- Desktop-first UX feels dated next to web-native journals
When Edgewonk wins
You trade forex or CFDs full-time and want the deepest manual journaling toolkit on the market.
Visit: edgewonk.com
4. TradeZella
Best for: US equities and futures day traders who value modern UX
A modern, polished journal aimed at US equities and futures day traders. Clean UI, calendar-style P&L view, and a growing community feature set.
Pros
- Best-in-class UI/UX of the legacy journals
- Strong community features (mentor mode, shared playbooks)
- Quick imports from US brokers (TD, ToS, Tradovate, etc.)
Cons
- No Hyperliquid integration; CSV import only
- Subscription stacks up if you also pay for execution platforms
- Designed around US trading hours — less useful for 24/7 crypto
When TradeZella wins
You day trade US equities or futures and prefer a polished modern interface to legacy tools.
Visit: tradezella.com
5. Tradelytics
Best for: Crypto traders splitting volume across multiple CEXes
A multi-exchange crypto journal supporting CEXes (Binance, Bybit, OKX) and a growing list of DEXs. Strong on cross-venue aggregation, lighter on perpetual-futures-specific features.
Pros
- Multi-exchange aggregation (Binance, Bybit, OKX, etc.)
- API imports for major CEXes — no manual CSV
- Cross-venue PnL view in one dashboard
Cons
- Hyperliquid integration is generic (read-only) — no execution
- No position sizer, no playbook engine
- Less specialized for perp-specific concerns (funding, basis, oracle premium)
When Tradelytics wins
You spread perps across multiple CEXes and want a single read-only dashboard for cross-venue PnL.
Visit: tradelytics.com
Methodology & honesty disclosure
PerpLog wrote this guide. We rank ourselves #1 for Hyperliquid traders because we built the product specifically for that use case — not because we're the best tool for every trader. If you don't trade Hyperliquid, one of the alternatives above is almost certainly a better fit, and we recommend them sincerely. We update this page when competitor features or pricing change.
For background on why position sizing, journaling, and fee modeling matter together, see our guides on position sizing for perpetual futures, why traders need a journal, and Hyperliquid fees explained.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best trading journal for Hyperliquid in 2026?
For Hyperliquid-native traders, PerpLog is the best fit because it combines auto-journaling with execution: trades placed through the platform log themselves with real fee accounting. For traders splitting volume across CEXes, Tradelytics offers cross-venue aggregation. For deep multi-asset journaling on stocks or options, Tradervue remains the legacy standard.
Do trading journals work with Hyperliquid?
Most legacy journals (Tradervue, Edgewonk, TradeZella) require manual CSV import for Hyperliquid trades, since they were built for stock/options brokers. PerpLog is built directly on the Hyperliquid API and auto-journals every executed trade with full fees and PnL. Tradelytics offers read-only Hyperliquid sync as part of its multi-exchange dashboard.
Is there a free trading journal for Hyperliquid?
PerpLog charges no subscription — every feature is free, and the only cost is a 0.01% (1 basis point) fee on trades executed through the platform. If you only journal manually, Tradervue has a free tier and Tradelytics offers a limited free plan as well.
Should I use a position sizer or a trading journal first?
Both. A journal without a sizer means you risk inconsistent amounts per trade; a sizer without a journal means you can't learn from past trades. PerpLog ships them together, which is why it ranks #1 for Hyperliquid traders specifically. If you already use a separate sizer, a stand-alone journal like Tradervue is fine.
Can I migrate from Tradervue or TradeZella to PerpLog?
You don't need to migrate historical data. PerpLog auto-journals trades you execute through it going forward; existing journal history can stay where it is. The two are complementary if you trade both Hyperliquid and other markets.